Quick Leopard Report: Spotlight vs QuickSilver

Posted 10 years, 1 month ago by Tim    8 comments

Searching for "pho" brings up both PhotoShop and PhotoBooth
Searching for "pho" brings up both PhotoShop and PhotoBooth
Spotlight is now very impressive. For people using QuickSilver as a simple Application launcher, there's may not be any reason to keep using it.

Both Spotlight and QuickSilver work as an application launcher in the same way. Hit a key combo, start typing a few letters of the application you want, and press enter. I just updated QuickSilver and it works great in Leopard.

Spotlight will remember what application you last used for a specific combination of letters, for example typing "pho" for the first time brings up "PhotoShop" as the first choice. If you instead select "PhotoBooth", the next time you type "pho" PhotoBooth will appear as the first choice.

QuickSilver isn't quite as automatic, but gives the user a bit more control, with the ability to right click on either application and select 'Set as default for "pho"'

Obviously QuickSilver has far more capabilities than just launching applications, but I imagine many users won't be doing more than that. The only other feature I use is global key commands to skip tracks in iTunes.

Spotlight has also made some other improvements, including removing the very odd "Show All" panel that was in Tiger. It wasn't really a panel, and it wasn't really a window, being a weird hybrid that didn't work with Exposé or the dock. Now that panel doesn't exist anymore, choosing "Show All" simply brings up a finder search window, making the window easier to deal with, although perhaps loosing some of the functionality the old panel had.

The new "Show All" panel
The new "Show All" panel

After installing Leopard it took about 30 minutes for Spotlight to index our MacBook Pro, which has about 100GB of random data.

All in all, the faster SpotLight is, the more useable it is. As it's now working pretty much instantly, QuickSilver may be redundant as an application launcher in Leopard. For older versions of OS X, QuickSilver is well worth using.

More quick reports coming soon. Be sure to subscribe...


Comments

Florian
10 years, 1 month ago
As long as I can launch QS by double taping the command key I'll stick with it. Plus QS opens up right under my nose and not in a far corner.
I use QS only as an app launcher.
cmore
10 years, 1 month ago
I believe that both QuickSilver and LaunchBar auto-learn your shortcuts. They just take more than single time to make something the default.
PictureCube
10 years ago
But with spotlight you can't supply a "object" to be acted on by the application. Can you?
10 years ago
@PictureCube - that's correct, you can only open an item with spotlight, so for power users, QuickSilver is still well worth using.
Albert
10 years ago
I searched but couldn't find anything: do you happen to know how much space do the QS indeces occupy with respect to Spotlight ones? The only reason I wouldn't install it on Leopard is disk space.
Geoff
10 years ago
On my new iMac I'm using Leopard Spotlight. However, on my PowerBook G4 Spotlight is still too slow. QS does a better job for me there; it's 10x faster.

Email this page...     Link to this page...
Shim